Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dr. Allan L. Gant v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency Dom Grant, Dea Agent Sherrie Lanham, Dea Agent R.M. Young, Dea Agent, 96-1508 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1508 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 03, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 117 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dr. Allan L. GANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; Dom Grant, DEA Agent; Sherrie Lanham, DEA Agent; R.M. Young, DEA Agent, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-1508. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circui
More

103 F.3d 117

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dr. Allan L. GANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; Dom Grant, DEA Agent;
Sherrie Lanham, DEA Agent; R.M. Young, DEA Agent,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1508.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1996.
Decided Dec. 3, 1996.

Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendants in Grant's civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, No. CA-95-982-2 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer