Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Melvin P. Deutsch v. United States Department of Justice United States Marshals Service, 96-7132 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7132 Visitors: 129
Filed: Dec. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 117 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Melvin P. DEUTSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States Marshals Service, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-7132. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 26, 1996. Decid
More

103 F.3d 117

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melvin P. DEUTSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States Marshals
Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-7132.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 26, 1996.
Decided Dec. 17, 1996.

Melvin P. Deutsch, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order requiring him to pay a partial filing fee in order to pursue his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). This issue has already been resolved against Appellant. Deutsch v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. 95-7928 (4th Cir. Apr. 29, 1996) (unpublished). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), as amended by Prison Reform Litigation Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer