Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

96-1544 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1544 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 118 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Harold D. HOUSE; Deborah S. House, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AIKEN COUNTY NATIONAL BANK; Wade Brodie; Gordon Parrott; Ted Morton; L.O. Benton; Harold D. Enloe; Michael Laughlin; David Lock; Stanley Jackson; Richard Von Beudin
More

103 F.3d 118

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harold D. HOUSE; Deborah S. House, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AIKEN COUNTY NATIONAL BANK; Wade Brodie; Gordon Parrott;
Ted Morton; L.O. Benton; Harold D. Enloe; Michael
Laughlin; David Lock; Stanley Jackson; Richard Von
Beudingen; Gary Milner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 1996.
Decided Dec. 18, 1996.

Harold D. House, Deborah S. House, Appellants Pro Se. James Rezner Barber, III, TODD & BARBER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal the district court's order granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment without prejudice to Appellants' right to seek further appropriate relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. House v. Aiken County Nat'l Bank, No. CA-94-1560-1-6BC (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer