Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dian Hicks v. Employment Security Commission of North Carolina, 96-2502 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2502 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 118 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dian HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-2502. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 12, 1996. Decided Dec. 18, 1996. Dian Hicks
More

103 F.3d 118

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dian HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-2502.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 1996.
Decided Dec. 18, 1996.

Dian Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R.App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6).

2

The district court entered its order on August 15, 1996; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on October 22, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain either an extension or a reopening of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer