Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marvin David Moore v. George P. Dodson, Warden, 95-7970 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7970 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 02, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Marvin David MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George P. DODSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-7970. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 19, 1996. Decided Dec. 2, 1996. Bruce McCoy Steen, MCGUIRE,
More

103 F.3d 119

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Marvin David MOORE, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
George P. DODSON, Warden, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-7970.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 19, 1996.
Decided Dec. 2, 1996.

Bruce McCoy Steen, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Dodson, No. CA-95-770-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer