Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert Tyrone Morgan v. Commissioner, Maryland Division of Corrections Warden, Baltimore City Detention Center Prison Health Services, Incorporated, 96-7366 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7366 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 20, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Tyrone MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, Maryland Division of Corrections; Warden, Baltimore City Detention Center; Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-7366. United States Cou
More

103 F.3d 119

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Tyrone MORGAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER, Maryland Division of Corrections; Warden,
Baltimore City Detention Center; Prison Health
Services, Incorporated, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-7366.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1996.
Decided Nov. 20, 1996.

Robert Tyrone Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan v. Commissioner, No. CA-96-1405-H (D.Md. Aug. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer