Filed: Dec. 03, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wayne E. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Irma Joyce RUBY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-2231. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1996. Decided Dec. 3, 1996. Wayne E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se
Summary: 103 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wayne E. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Irma Joyce RUBY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-2231. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1996. Decided Dec. 3, 1996. Wayne E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se...
More
103 F.3d 119
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wayne E. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Irma Joyce RUBY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-2231.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 21, 1996.
Decided Dec. 3, 1996.
Wayne E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Irma Joyce Ruby, Appellee Pro Se.
S.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
