Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael Lee Roy v. Lorraine Singleton, 96-7155 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7155 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 02, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael Lee ROY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-7155. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 19, 1996. Decided Dec. 2, 1996. Michael Lee Roy, Appellant Pro Se. Befo
More

103 F.3d 120

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Lee ROY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lorraine SINGLETON, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 96-7155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 19, 1996.
Decided Dec. 2, 1996.

Michael Lee Roy, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roy v. Singleton, No. CA-96-369 (E.D.Va. July 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer