Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Patricia D. Edwards, A/K/A Patricia D. Lancaster, and Michael W. Lancaster, Clover M. Farms, Incorporated, Garnishee, 95-2874 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2874 Visitors: 36
Filed: Dec. 04, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 121 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia D. EDWARDS, a/k/a Patricia D. Lancaster, Defendant-Appellant, and Michael W. Lancaster, Defendant, CLOVER M. FARMS, INCORPORATED, Garnishee. No. 95-2874. United States
More

103 F.3d 121

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Patricia D. EDWARDS, a/k/a Patricia D. Lancaster, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Michael W. Lancaster, Defendant,
CLOVER M. FARMS, INCORPORATED, Garnishee.

No. 95-2874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1996.
Decided December 4, 1996.

Patricia D. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.

Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the Appellee a deficiency judgment against her. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Edwards, No. CA-94-685-5-FD (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16 & Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer