Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Douglas Ross v. Willie James Thompson, Warden Federal Correctional Institute--Morgantown, 96-6776 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6776 Visitors: 48
Filed: Jan. 14, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 105 F.3d 648 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Douglas ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie James THOMPSON, Warden; Federal Correctional Institute-Morgantown, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-6776. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 3, 1996. Deci
More

105 F.3d 648

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Douglas ROSS, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Willie James THOMPSON, Warden; Federal Correctional
Institute--Morgantown, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 96-6776.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1996.
Decided Jan. 14, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-48-1)

Douglas Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Douglas Ross appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Thompson, No. CA-96-48-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 1, 1996).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Appellant's motions to expedite and for bail pending appeal are denied as moot

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer