Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lawrence W. Campbell v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 96-6580 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6580 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jan. 31, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 106 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lawrence W. CAMPBELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-6580. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1
More

106 F.3d 389

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lawrence W. CAMPBELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of The State of
South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-6580.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 1997.
Decided Jan. 31, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-271-3-21BC)

Lawrence W. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS,* and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lawrence W. Campbell seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. July 1996, Pamplet 2). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. South Carolina, No. CA-95-271-3-21BC (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

Judge Wilkins did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer