Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steven W. Bell v. James B. French, 96-7027 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7027 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 23, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 106 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Steven W. BELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James B. FRENCH, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-7027. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1997. Decided Jan. 23, 1997. Appeal from the United States District
More

106 F.3d 389

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven W. BELL, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
James B. FRENCH, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 96-7027.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 1997.
Decided Jan. 23, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-506-5-BR)

Steven W. Bell, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. French, No. CA-96-506-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 24, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer