Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael Dwayne Brown v. Ronald Angelone, Director, 96-7212 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7212 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 04, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 106 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael Dwayne BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-7212. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1997. Decided Feb. 4, 1997. Appeal from the United
More

106 F.3d 389

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Dwayne BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-7212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 1997.
Decided Feb. 4, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-801-AM)

Michael Dwayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Angelone, No. CA-96-801-AM (E.D.Va. July 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer