Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Midlands Technical College, 09-2207 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-2207 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2207 SHIRLEY A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE; RONALD RHAMES, in their individual capacity; TIMOTHY MCLELLAN, in their individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-00803-JFA) Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judg
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2207 SHIRLEY A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE; RONALD RHAMES, in their individual capacity; TIMOTHY MCLELLAN, in their individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-00803-JFA) Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shirley A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Lake E. Summers, Charles Franklin Thompson, Jr., MALONE, THOMPSON, SUMMERS & OTT, Columbia, South Carolina; Henry Knight, Jr., CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shirley A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying her employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Midlands Technical Coll., No. 3:08-cv-00803-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer