Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Burgess v. Ybarra, 09-7569 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7569 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7569 KINGDAWUD MUJAHID BURGESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AARON R. YBARRA, Agent; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THROUGH THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00120-GBL-TCB) Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and K
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7569 KINGDAWUD MUJAHID BURGESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AARON R. YBARRA, Agent; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THROUGH THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00120-GBL-TCB) Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kingdawud Mujahid Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Yiris E. Cornwall, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kingdawud Mujahid Burgess appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier order dismissing his action without prejudice based on Burgess’ failure to comply with court orders to provide notification of his transfer, release, or relocation, or risk involuntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burgess v. Ybarra, No. 1:08-cv-00120-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. July 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer