Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael Godfrey v. Dr. Long, 12-6168 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6168 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6168 MICHAEL GRAY GODFREY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. LONG; DISCHARGE NURSE MIKE, Central Prison; HEAD NURSE, Lumberton Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03105-BO) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Aff
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6168 MICHAEL GRAY GODFREY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. LONG; DISCHARGE NURSE MIKE, Central Prison; HEAD NURSE, Lumberton Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03105-BO) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Gray Godfrey, Appellant Pro Se. Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Gray Godfrey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godfrey v. Long, No. 5:10-ct-03105-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer