Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas Gust v. US Airways, 12-1075 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1075 Visitors: 29
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1075 THOMAS E. GUST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US AIRWAYS; US AIRWAYS PAYROLL/GARNISHMENTS SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00133-MR-DLH) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1075 THOMAS E. GUST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US AIRWAYS; US AIRWAYS PAYROLL/GARNISHMENTS SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00133-MR-DLH) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas E. Gust, Appellant Pro Se. Evan M. Sauda, SMITH MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas E. Gust appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for failure to state a claim his suit against his former employer, U.S. Airways and U.S. Airways Payroll/Garnishments Services, for recovery of wages and withheld in accordance with a tax lien and damages arising therefrom. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gust v. U.S. Airways, No. 1:11-cv-00133-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer