Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Leslie Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, 12-1016 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1016 Visitors: 34
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1016 LESLIE A. HAYMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NA; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICER LP, d/b/a Bank of America, NA; BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; RECONTRUST COMPANY, NA; ALG TRUSTEE, LLC; MERS, Inc.; REDC DEFAULT SOLUTIONS; BANK OF AMERICA, NA; DOES 1-100, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Ju
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1016 LESLIE A. HAYMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NA; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICER LP, d/b/a Bank of America, NA; BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; RECONTRUST COMPANY, NA; ALG TRUSTEE, LLC; MERS, Inc.; REDC DEFAULT SOLUTIONS; BANK OF AMERICA, NA; DOES 1-100, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00800-AJT-JFA) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leslie A. Haymond, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Monger, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Dean L. Robinson, ATLANTIC LAW GROUP, LLC, Leesburg, Virginia; Carrie Margaret Harris, King Fitchett Tower, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC, * The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006). Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Leslie A. Haymond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA, No. 1:11-cv- 00800-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer