Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Douglas Hall v. James Johnson, 11-7656 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-7656 Visitors: 49
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7656 DOUGLAS HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES JOHNSON; BRIAN A. BAILEY, Defendants - Appellees, and JAMES MCNEIL; BUCKEY SPROUSE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00143-GRA) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpubl
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7656 DOUGLAS HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES JOHNSON; BRIAN A. BAILEY, Defendants - Appellees, and JAMES MCNEIL; BUCKEY SPROUSE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00143-GRA) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Johnson, No. 7:11-cv-00143-GRA (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer