Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2304 ALAN J. SHEPPARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM O. HIGGINS, as lawyer with Ellis Lawhorne & Sims PA; RONALD C. OWENS, as agent with guarantor KRA; RUSSEL BENNETT, as guarantor; CHARLES P. DARBY, as guarantor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:11-cv-01538-DCN) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2304 ALAN J. SHEPPARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM O. HIGGINS, as lawyer with Ellis Lawhorne & Sims PA; RONALD C. OWENS, as agent with guarantor KRA; RUSSEL BENNETT, as guarantor; CHARLES P. DARBY, as guarantor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:11-cv-01538-DCN) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2304 ALAN J. SHEPPARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM O. HIGGINS, as lawyer with Ellis Lawhorne & Sims PA; RONALD C. OWENS, as agent with guarantor KRA; RUSSEL BENNETT, as guarantor; CHARLES P. DARBY, as guarantor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:11-cv-01538-DCN) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan J. Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan J. Sheppard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his civil suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sheppard v. Higgins, No. 2:11-cv-01538- DCN (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
