Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6356 JAMES A. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN GREGORY T. HERSHBERGER; CAMELLIA ROSEMAN; MS. GRIMMITT, Case Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-02971-AW) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6356 JAMES A. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN GREGORY T. HERSHBERGER; CAMELLIA ROSEMAN; MS. GRIMMITT, Case Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-02971-AW) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unp..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6356
JAMES A. WARREN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN GREGORY T. HERSHBERGER; CAMELLIA
ROSEMAN; MS. GRIMMITT, Case Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-02971-AW)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Warren, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James A. Warren appeals the district court’s order
granting in part, and denying in part, the Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We dismiss Warren’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. §
1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders.
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Warren seeks to appeal is not a final order, nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2