Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles Tisdale v. Barack Obama, 12-1124 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1124 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1124 CHARLES TISDALE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HONORABLE BARACK H. OBAMA, personally and in his official capacity as President of the United States; DON PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections; THE VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NEIL H. MACBRIDE, in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendants
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1124 CHARLES TISDALE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HONORABLE BARACK H. OBAMA, personally and in his official capacity as President of the United States; DON PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections; THE VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NEIL H. MACBRIDE, in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees. ------------------------- MARIO APUZZO, Amicus Supporting Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00036-JAG) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Tisdale, Appellant Pro Se. Mario Apuzzo, MARIO APUZZO ATTORNEY AT LAW, Jamesburg, New Jersey, Amicus Supporting Appellant. David Brett Kolker, Associate General Counsel, FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Charles Tisdale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and motion for an injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tisdale v. Obama, No. 3:12-cv-00036-JAG (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012). We deny Tisdale’s motions to expedite the appeal and for an injunction, and to recuse Judges Davis, Keenan, Wynn, Diaz, and Floyd. We grant the motion to file an amicus curiae brief and file it out of time. We deny all other pending motions filed by Tisdale. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer