Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Norwood Barber, Jr., 11-7645 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-7645 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jun. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7645 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NORWOOD WALLACE BARBER, JR., a/k/a Pee Wee Barber, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00015-SGW-RSB-1) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7645 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NORWOOD WALLACE BARBER, JR., a/k/a Pee Wee Barber, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00015-SGW-RSB-1) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barber, No. 5:05-cr-00015-SGW-RSB-1 (W.D. Va. filed Nov. 3 & entered Nov. 7, 2011). We further deny Barber’s motion for disposition hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer