Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Juanita Dickerson, 12-6546 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6546 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6546 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JUANITA JEAN DICKERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00083-2) Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juanita Jean Dickerso
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6546 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JUANITA JEAN DICKERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00083-2) Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juanita Jean Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Erik S. Goes, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia; Joshua Clarke Hanks, Richard Gregory McVey, Assistant United States Attorneys, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Juanita Jean Dickerson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dickerson, No. 3:04-cr- 00083-2 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the fact and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer