Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joshua Gallishaw v. Officer Deloach, 12-6730 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6730 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6730 JOSHUA LATRON GALLISHAW, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICER DELOACH; OFFICER WILLIAMSON; SGT HICKS; CAPT BEST; WARDEN COHEN; MAJOR NLN; SGT MARQUEZ; SGT HOUSEY; LT HOUSEY; SCDC DIRECTOR, and other unknown John Does, Janes Does, individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (9:
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6730 JOSHUA LATRON GALLISHAW, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICER DELOACH; OFFICER WILLIAMSON; SGT HICKS; CAPT BEST; WARDEN COHEN; MAJOR NLN; SGT MARQUEZ; SGT HOUSEY; LT HOUSEY; SCDC DIRECTOR, and other unknown John Does, Janes Does, individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (9:11-cv-00404-CMC) Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Latron Gallishaw, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joshua Latron Gallishaw appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gallishaw v. Deloach, No. 9:11-cv-00404-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 16 & Apr. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer