Filed: Jun. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6742 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cr-01207-GRA-1) Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6742 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cr-01207-GRA-1) Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6742 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cr-01207-GRA-1) Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Anthony Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 6:07-cr-01207-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
