Filed: Jul. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1427 RODNEY B. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARNE DUNCAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11- cv-00158-RWT) Submitted: June 28, 2012 Decided: July 11, 2012 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney B. Jones, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1427 RODNEY B. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARNE DUNCAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11- cv-00158-RWT) Submitted: June 28, 2012 Decided: July 11, 2012 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney B. Jones, Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1427 RODNEY B. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARNE DUNCAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11- cv-00158-RWT) Submitted: June 28, 2012 Decided: July 11, 2012 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney B. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Marie Castaldi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney B. Jones appeals the district court’s order entering judgment for Defendant in this action raising various challenges in connection with disputed student loans. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Duncan, No. 8:11-cv-00158-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
