Filed: Jul. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6206 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIE WOODLAND, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1) Submitted: June 22, 2012 Decided: July 16, 2012 Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Woodlan
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6206 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIE WOODLAND, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1) Submitted: June 22, 2012 Decided: July 16, 2012 Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Woodland..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6206
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIE WOODLAND, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2012 Decided: July 16, 2012
Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Woodland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie Woodland, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Woodland, No. 5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1 (N.D. W. Va.
Jan. 17, 2012); see United States v. Brown,
653 F.3d 337 (4th
Cir. 2011), cert. denied,
132 S. Ct. 1003 (2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2