Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Willie Woodland, Jr., 12-6206 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6206 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6206 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIE WOODLAND, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1) Submitted: June 22, 2012 Decided: July 16, 2012 Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Woodlan
More
                             UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 12-6206


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

WILLIE WOODLAND, JR.,

                Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.     Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1)


Submitted:   June 22, 2012                 Decided:   July 16, 2012


Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Willie Woodland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.     John Castle Parr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Willie    Woodland,    Jr.       appeals   the   district     court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence.                    We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.               Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.                  United

States   v.   Woodland,    No.   5:08-cr-00003-FPS-1          (N.D.    W.    Va.

Jan. 17, 2012); see United States v. Brown, 
653 F.3d 337
 (4th

Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 
132 S. Ct. 1003
 (2012).                   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately    presented   in   the   materials       before   the    court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                       AFFIRMED




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer