Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Deirdre Glascoe v. Charles Martoff, 12-1318 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1318 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1318 DEIRDRE C. GLASCOE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHARLES J. MARTOFF, Defendant – Appellee, and KATE J. FRANCIS, a/k/a Kate Martoff; MONIFA N. BAILEY; JANE DOE 1; JANE DOE 2, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00708-GBL-TCB) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circ
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1318 DEIRDRE C. GLASCOE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHARLES J. MARTOFF, Defendant – Appellee, and KATE J. FRANCIS, a/k/a Kate Martoff; MONIFA N. BAILEY; JANE DOE 1; JANE DOE 2, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00708-GBL-TCB) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deirdre C. Glascoe, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Deidre C. Glascoe appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion for miscellaneous relief and requiring Glascoe to post a supersedeas bond to stay the order pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order granting miscellaneous relief, which is in accord with the April 16, 2010 agreement of the parties. Glascoe’s challenges to that agreement are unavailing. We deny as moot Glascoe’s attack on the supersedeas bond. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer