Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vicki Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Limited P'ship, 12-1223 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1223 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1223 VICKI A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; WESTERN INDUSTRIES- SOUTH, LLC, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE #1, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 B
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1223 VICKI A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; WESTERN INDUSTRIES- SOUTH, LLC, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE #1, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Wright Feehan, KUTAK ROCK LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Janeen Beth Koch, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for the defendants in her action alleging premises liability and negligent application of a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2012 & Apr. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer