Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wilhelmina Moore v. Williamsburg County School District, 12-1144 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1144 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1144 WILHELMINA MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; RALPH FENNELL, JR., Superintendent; RUMELL TAYLOR, Principal; BETTY R. MCKNIGHT; PEPPER RAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-03800-TLW) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1144 WILHELMINA MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; RALPH FENNELL, JR., Superintendent; RUMELL TAYLOR, Principal; BETTY R. MCKNIGHT; PEPPER RAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-03800-TLW) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilhelmina Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown, Carol Brittian Ervin, Brian Quisenberry, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Helen Tyler McFadden, Cades, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wilhelmina Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Williamsburg Cnty. Sch. Dist., No. 4:08-cv-03800-TLW (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer