Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Douglas Whitfield v. Officer Lee, 12-7110 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-7110 Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7110 DOUGLAS G. WHITFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER LEE; OFFICER STANCIL; LIEUTENANT SMITH, Defendants - Appellees, and DICK JENKINS, Sheriff; RANDLE SMITH, Lieutenant; DARREL LAND, Detective, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03151-D) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7110 DOUGLAS G. WHITFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER LEE; OFFICER STANCIL; LIEUTENANT SMITH, Defendants - Appellees, and DICK JENKINS, Sheriff; RANDLE SMITH, Lieutenant; DARREL LAND, Detective, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03151-D) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas G. Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas G. Whitfield appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitfield v. Lee, No. 5:10-ct-03151-D (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer