Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael Williams v. James Lyles, 12-7046 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-7046 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7046 MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES E. LYLES, Trooper First Class; KENNY L. BROWN, Senior Trooper; KYLE L. DUNGEE, Trooper First Class, Defendants – Appellees, and STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:11-cv-02972-WDQ) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Befor
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7046 MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES E. LYLES, Trooper First Class; KENNY L. BROWN, Senior Trooper; KYLE L. DUNGEE, Trooper First Class, Defendants – Appellees, and STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:11-cv-02972-WDQ) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Michael A. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Maryland, No. 1:11-cv-02972-WDQ (D. Md. June 5, 2012). We deny Williams’s motions for appointment of counsel and to compel the production of records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer