Filed: Nov. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2165 KIMBERLY JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD S. COHN, et al Substitute Trustees, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00393-GLR) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2165 KIMBERLY JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD S. COHN, et al Substitute Trustees, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00393-GLR) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2165 KIMBERLY JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD S. COHN, et al Substitute Trustees, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00393-GLR) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kimberly Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph McKeefery, COHN, GOLDBERG & DEUTSCH, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kimberly Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cohn, No. 1:12-cv-00393-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
