Filed: Nov. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1934 BRANDEN TOLLIVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-01821-PJM) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Branden Tolli
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1934 BRANDEN TOLLIVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-01821-PJM) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Branden Tolliv..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1934 BRANDEN TOLLIVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-01821-PJM) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Branden Tolliver, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Grace Gregory, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Branden Tolliver appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his federal income tax refund suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tolliver v. IRS, No. 8:12-cv-01821-PJM (D. Md. July 3, 2012). We deny Tolliver’s motion for district court correction and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
