Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marion Culberson v. Kelly Nichols, 12-1179 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1179 Visitors: 52
Filed: Dec. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1179 MARION TURK CULBERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KELLY NICHOLS, in her official capacity and individually; ANDERSON COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:11-cv-01708-TMC) Submitted: October 31, 2012 Decided: December 10, 2012 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1179 MARION TURK CULBERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KELLY NICHOLS, in her official capacity and individually; ANDERSON COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:11-cv-01708-TMC) Submitted: October 31, 2012 Decided: December 10, 2012 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles R. Griffin, Jr., THE GRIFFIN FIRM, L.L.C., Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Stephanie H. Burton, GIBBES BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marion Turk Culberson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and dismissing without prejudice his state law claims of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, outrageous conduct, and negligence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Culberson v. Nichols, No. 8:11-cv-01708-TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer