Filed: Dec. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7166 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2) Submitted: November 29, 2012 Decided: December 14, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubl
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7166 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2) Submitted: November 29, 2012 Decided: December 14, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7166 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2) Submitted: November 29, 2012 Decided: December 14, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2