Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Herbert Robinson v. Sergeant Wilson, 12-7427 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-7427 Visitors: 26
Filed: Dec. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7427 HERBERT ALONZO ROBINSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SERGEANT JILL WILSON, a/k/a Wilson; LOGAN FEY, a/k/a Frye; JOHN DOES, in their individual capacity including any and all Jane Does; MICHELLE REDDEN, a/k/a Ms. Redden; SERGEANT CHRISTINE HARRISON, a/k/a Sergeant Harrison; SERGEANT BRIAN DUVAL, a/k/a Sergeant Duval, Defendants – Appellees, and STEPHANIE SINGLETON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court f
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7427 HERBERT ALONZO ROBINSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SERGEANT JILL WILSON, a/k/a Wilson; LOGAN FEY, a/k/a Frye; JOHN DOES, in their individual capacity including any and all Jane Does; MICHELLE REDDEN, a/k/a Ms. Redden; SERGEANT CHRISTINE HARRISON, a/k/a Sergeant Harrison; SERGEANT BRIAN DUVAL, a/k/a Sergeant Duval, Defendants – Appellees, and STEPHANIE SINGLETON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:11-cv-02285-RBH) Submitted: December 12, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Alonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Wilcox Buyck, Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; Elloree Ann Ganes, Thomas Happel Scurry, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Wilson, No. 8:11-cv-02285-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer