Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Samuel Mwabira-Simera v. Thompson Hospitality Services, 12-1439 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1439 Visitors: 39
Filed: Dec. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1439 SAMUEL H. MWABIRA-SIMERA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THOMPSON HOSPITALITY SERVICES, LLP; DERRICK TERRY; MONICA BOCKMAN; JERRY HARCUM; KEVIN MORA; RANDALL MUSE; DEENA SKINNER; SHATAVIA ADDISON; JOHN STEVENSON; DAVID BOWLES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William N. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-02989-WMN; 1:12-cv-00848-ELH) Sub
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1439 SAMUEL H. MWABIRA-SIMERA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THOMPSON HOSPITALITY SERVICES, LLP; DERRICK TERRY; MONICA BOCKMAN; JERRY HARCUM; KEVIN MORA; RANDALL MUSE; DEENA SKINNER; SHATAVIA ADDISON; JOHN STEVENSON; DAVID BOWLES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William N. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-02989-WMN; 1:12-cv-00848-ELH) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Dowd, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mwabira-Simera v. Thompson Hosp. Servs., LLP, Nos. 1:11-cv-02989-WMN; 1:12-cv-00848-ELH (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer