Filed: Dec. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7724 JEROME BRANCH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MS. BADGETT, Head Nurse; MS. WHITE, RNC-A Nurse; EDWARD BOAKYE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. Senior District Judge. (2:11-cv-00124-HCM-FBS) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7724 JEROME BRANCH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MS. BADGETT, Head Nurse; MS. WHITE, RNC-A Nurse; EDWARD BOAKYE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. Senior District Judge. (2:11-cv-00124-HCM-FBS) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7724 JEROME BRANCH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MS. BADGETT, Head Nurse; MS. WHITE, RNC-A Nurse; EDWARD BOAKYE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. Senior District Judge. (2:11-cv-00124-HCM-FBS) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Branch appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Branch v. Badgett, No. 2:11-cv-00124-HCM-FBS (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
