Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alan Fabian v. Zvi Guttman, 12-2023 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2023 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2023 ALAN BRIAN FABIAN, Defendant - Appellant, v. ZVI GUTTMAN, for Strategic Partners International, Inc., Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-03155-WMN; 99-00443) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 21, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2023 ALAN BRIAN FABIAN, Defendant - Appellant, v. ZVI GUTTMAN, for Strategic Partners International, Inc., Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-03155-WMN; 99-00443) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 21, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan Brian Fabian, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Leidig, SHAPIRO, SHER, GUINOT & SANDLER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan B. Fabian appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that Fabian’s debt to Strategic Partners International, Inc., is nondischargeable in bankruptcy. Our review of the record and the arguments of the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fabian v. Guttman, Nos. 1:11-cv-03155-WMN; 99-00443 (D. Md. July 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer