Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fatemeh Najafian v. Chevy Chase Bank, 12-2081 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2081 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2081 FATEMEH NAJAFIAN, Debtor - Appellant, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK; CAPITAL ONE N.A.; FANNIE MAE, Creditors – Appellees, KEVIN R MCCARTHY; W. CLARKSON MCDOW, JR., U. S. Trustee, Trustees – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00462-GBL-TCB) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012 Before KING and DUN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2081 FATEMEH NAJAFIAN, Debtor - Appellant, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK; CAPITAL ONE N.A.; FANNIE MAE, Creditors – Appellees, KEVIN R MCCARTHY; W. CLARKSON MCDOW, JR., U. S. Trustee, Trustees – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00462-GBL-TCB) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatemeh Najafian, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Dean McMahan, Jr., Tennille Jo Checkovich, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Lori Michelle Scott, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Frank J. Bove, Martha Lorene Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Fatemeh Najafian appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Najafian v. Chevy Chase Bank, No. 1:12-cv-00462-GBL-TCB. (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2012; Aug. 21, 2012). We grant Najafian’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer