Filed: Dec. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1986 ALMIA J. MCCRIEF, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WACHOVIA BANK, a/k/a Wells Fargo Bank; BANK OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00072-MBS-BHH) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1986 ALMIA J. MCCRIEF, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WACHOVIA BANK, a/k/a Wells Fargo Bank; BANK OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00072-MBS-BHH) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dism..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1986
ALMIA J. MCCRIEF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WACHOVIA BANK, a/k/a Wells Fargo Bank; BANK OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00072-MBS-BHH)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Almia J. McCrief, Appellant Pro Se. Trudy Hartzog Robertson,
MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC, Charleston, South Carolina; R. Michael
Ethridge, John T. Floyd, CARLOCK, COPELAND, SEMLER & STAIR, LLP,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Almia J. McCrief seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motions seeking recusal of the district court
and magistrate judges and to remand his case to state court.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
orders McCrief seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor
appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2