Filed: Jan. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ERWIN BERNARD REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1) Submitted: December 19, 2012 Decided: January 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ERWIN BERNARD REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1) Submitted: December 19, 2012 Decided: January 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ERWIN BERNARD REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1) Submitted: December 19, 2012 Decided: January 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Erwin Bernard Redding, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Erwin Bernard Redding appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redding, No. 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 26 & June 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
