Filed: Jan. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2338 HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT MCDONNELL, Governor, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00643-REP) Submitted: December 21, 2012 Decided: January 11, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2338 HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT MCDONNELL, Governor, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00643-REP) Submitted: December 21, 2012 Decided: January 11, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2338 HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT MCDONNELL, Governor, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00643-REP) Submitted: December 21, 2012 Decided: January 11, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hephzibah Bates, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hephzibah Bates appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint as frivolous and delusional under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bates v. McDonnell, No. 3:12-cv-00643-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
