Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Trident Products and Services v. Canadian Soiless Wholesale, 12-1668 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1668 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1668 TRIDENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Growtastic, f/k/a Natureshelpers, a Virginia Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CANADIAN SOILESS WHOLESALE, LTD., d/b/a Advanced Nutrients, a Canadian Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00877-JAG-MHL) Submitted: January
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1668 TRIDENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Growtastic, f/k/a Natureshelpers, a Virginia Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CANADIAN SOILESS WHOLESALE, LTD., d/b/a Advanced Nutrients, a Canadian Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00877-JAG-MHL) Submitted: January 9, 2013 Decided: January 18, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Aaron Allen, Andrew C. Aitken, GENERAL COUNSEL, PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. Howard S. Hogan, Jacob S. Siler, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Trident Products and Services, LLC appeals the district court’s order awarding Canadian Soiless Wholesale, Ltd., d/b/a Advanced Nutrients, summary judgment on Trident’s misappropriation of trade secrets claim under the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Va. Code Ann. §§ 59.1-336 to 59.1-343 (2006 & 2012 Cum. Supp.). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trident Prods. & Servs., LLC v. Canadian Soiless Wholesale, Ltd., No. 3:10-cv-00877-JAG-MHL (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer