Filed: Jan. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1880 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00381-REP) Submitted: January 10, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr.,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1880 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00381-REP) Submitted: January 10, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., A..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1880 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00381-REP) Submitted: January 10, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank, No. 3:10-cv-00381-REP (E.D. Va. July 3, 2012). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
