Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean, 12-2455 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2455 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2455 THOMAS L. SWITZER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean, Defendant – Appellee, and TOWN OF STANLEY; MAYOR DOUG PURDHAM; OFFICER BROWN; MARK BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff; DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2455 THOMAS L. SWITZER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean, Defendant – Appellee, and TOWN OF STANLEY; MAYOR DOUG PURDHAM; OFFICER BROWN; MARK BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff; DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013 Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, TAYLOR ZUNKA MILNOR & CARTER, LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Sergeant Dean, No. 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer