Filed: Apr. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7966 RONALD WAYNE LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MACHELL BEACH, Medical Doctor, Peninsula Institute for Community; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants – Appellees, and JOSEPH PENCA, Case Manager, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00731-JRS) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7966 RONALD WAYNE LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MACHELL BEACH, Medical Doctor, Peninsula Institute for Community; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants – Appellees, and JOSEPH PENCA, Case Manager, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00731-JRS) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7966
RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MACHELL BEACH, Medical Doctor, Peninsula Institute for
Community; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOSEPH PENCA, Case Manager,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00731-JRS)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland
Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Wayne Lewis appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal
Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.
2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Lewis v. Beach, No. 3:10-cv-00731-JRS
(E.D. Va. July 27 & Nov. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3