Filed: Apr. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8147 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-6308 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cr-00113-F-1) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 11, 2013 Before
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8147 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-6308 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cr-00113-F-1) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 11, 2013 Before ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8147
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-6308
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (4:11-cr-00113-F-1)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 11, 2013
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Edward Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Edward Frazier seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders denying his pro se motions to withdraw his guilty
plea. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders
Frazier seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable
interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3